Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave's avatar

You may have to double check the arithmetic, it's notoriously bad at it (it only guesses the next best likely word/punctuation in a sentence, it doesn't have any internal rules for accuracy). Plus, GIGO - If the dataset has errors, it will replicate them, and most people are sloppy with arithmetic, let alone math.

Essentially, Chat GPT is the ultimate bullshitting machine. It should run for elected office!

Expand full comment
Elliott Middleton's avatar

Doing a little checking on the numbers, an industry source said you might get 300-400 watt-hours a day instead of the 100 (=60*100/6) implied here, but doesn't change the basic uneconomical result. Esp. not including a battery to capture energy for on-demand use. All the other assumptions check out. Thought-provoking at least and a good exercise. Even the creators don't really know how these gigantic NN AIs come up with their results. No cost associated with disposal either ....

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts