As an aside, I have seen some effort to use the UCC as a route.....generally, the UCC is an instrument for problem-solving, for avoiding litigation, as it were, in the normal course of business....I have read in a number of places that contract law is likely the best route back to common law....tending to agree. If it's all about clear consent of parties and actionable injury, then k law may be a doorway.....start with mortgages.
Returning to The Common Law would be, in my view, the best route back to something that ACTUALLY makes sense.
We already have a return, in the Chevron deference case...Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, I think. We have ALL we need, except for ACTION.
Our words and even thoughts help as they ride frequency waves through the collective aethers
As an aside, I have seen some effort to use the UCC as a route.....generally, the UCC is an instrument for problem-solving, for avoiding litigation, as it were, in the normal course of business....I have read in a number of places that contract law is likely the best route back to common law....tending to agree. If it's all about clear consent of parties and actionable injury, then k law may be a doorway.....start with mortgages.
Yeah, I refer to mtges as "deeds of Bounty" don't believe me? Just skip a few payments and you'll realize the bounty hunters are coming for you
Hmmm, that's almost unkind. But I get it.
Residential Mortgage originator for 40 years. A corrupt system.