"broad sweeping identity based on an irrelevantly assigned color"
Most of what you wrote is good: This, however, is stupid wrong commie propaganda! Genetic studies across *populations* show that the vast vast MAJORITY of people self-identify AS the color their genetics/appeance indicate! There are absolutely different SUBSPECIES, who are,…
"broad sweeping identity based on an irrelevantly assigned color"
Most of what you wrote is good: This, however, is stupid wrong commie propaganda! Genetic studies across *populations* show that the vast vast MAJORITY of people self-identify AS the color their genetics/appeance indicate! There are absolutely different SUBSPECIES, who are, in the main, what their own and other's EXTERNAL appearance leads them to conclude.
You are intentionally -- and illicitly! -- trying to hide that absolute boundaries between populations by suggesting the ... "relationship diversity" of miscegenation **AT THE EDGES** of a genetic population somehow wipes out the genetic identity of the vast majority of that/any population! What you are suggesting is, in essence: there is no such thing as being ill -- because there is a non-definite/defining (physical/visual/genetic) boundary between "I'm ill" and "I'm healthy" -- you are declaring there is NO SUCH THING as being ill!!!
THAT is commie propaganda to destroy the natural and normal connection of shared genetics! Steve Sailer has a lovely definition -- which I will proceed to mangle, but it goes about like this: a "race" {he uses a term I no longer use} consists of a very large, extended family connected by GENETICS.
So, yes WHITE absolutely exists and is an *accurate* description of a very large, extended family that shares MORE genes with the others in the population than with humans outside that genetically related population. And just as you are closely related to your cousins, but not AS closely as to your siblings -- White Americans are closely related across their many varied NATIONAL connections. For instance, I am WAY more closely connected to the Scots, Brits, and Germans, than I am to East Europeans in their various national lines. But I am, WAY more closely connected TO East Europeans than to ANY African, Asian, or other non-White population.
Your phrase: "irrelevantly assigned color" is intentional EVIL and designed to DESTROY the "extended genetically related" family that is White people (or Black people or Asian people)! And you're not merely lacking science and biology education, you've missed history entirely! NO "diverse" society since the beginning of humans has EVER succeeded! (And probably before humans began: look to ANY mammalian species! No mammal 'pretends to value' diversity.)
ALL homogeneous societies ALWAYS result from either ethnic cleansing or expulsion. EVERY single one EVER! This is the history -- and future! -- of ALL human species. Period, no exceptions!
"broad sweeping identity based on an irrelevantly assigned color"
Most of what you wrote is good: This, however, is stupid wrong commie propaganda! Genetic studies across *populations* show that the vast vast MAJORITY of people self-identify AS the color their genetics/appeance indicate! There are absolutely different SUBSPECIES, who are, in the main, what their own and other's EXTERNAL appearance leads them to conclude.
You are intentionally -- and illicitly! -- trying to hide that absolute boundaries between populations by suggesting the ... "relationship diversity" of miscegenation **AT THE EDGES** of a genetic population somehow wipes out the genetic identity of the vast majority of that/any population! What you are suggesting is, in essence: there is no such thing as being ill -- because there is a non-definite/defining (physical/visual/genetic) boundary between "I'm ill" and "I'm healthy" -- you are declaring there is NO SUCH THING as being ill!!!
THAT is commie propaganda to destroy the natural and normal connection of shared genetics! Steve Sailer has a lovely definition -- which I will proceed to mangle, but it goes about like this: a "race" {he uses a term I no longer use} consists of a very large, extended family connected by GENETICS.
So, yes WHITE absolutely exists and is an *accurate* description of a very large, extended family that shares MORE genes with the others in the population than with humans outside that genetically related population. And just as you are closely related to your cousins, but not AS closely as to your siblings -- White Americans are closely related across their many varied NATIONAL connections. For instance, I am WAY more closely connected to the Scots, Brits, and Germans, than I am to East Europeans in their various national lines. But I am, WAY more closely connected TO East Europeans than to ANY African, Asian, or other non-White population.
Your phrase: "irrelevantly assigned color" is intentional EVIL and designed to DESTROY the "extended genetically related" family that is White people (or Black people or Asian people)! And you're not merely lacking science and biology education, you've missed history entirely! NO "diverse" society since the beginning of humans has EVER succeeded! (And probably before humans began: look to ANY mammalian species! No mammal 'pretends to value' diversity.)
ALL homogeneous societies ALWAYS result from either ethnic cleansing or expulsion. EVERY single one EVER! This is the history -- and future! -- of ALL human species. Period, no exceptions!