(1) I've always seen parapsychology, remote viewing, and ESP as pseudoscience. But then I got involved in collaborations with Hameroff and his friends, and they all believe it. They also hook up with other scientists who receive grant money from the DOD for research on remote viewing, so maybe they're simply in it for t…
(1) I've always seen parapsychology, remote viewing, and ESP as pseudoscience. But then I got involved in collaborations with Hameroff and his friends, and they all believe it. They also hook up with other scientists who receive grant money from the DOD for research on remote viewing, so maybe they're simply in it for the money. As I've mentioned before, I think Hameroff is a free-thinker and NOT in it for the money. Me? I'm slightly more mainstream than Hameroff, but I also consider myself a free-thinker.
(2) This idea of free thinkers astonishes me. Something you said, Clif, struck me. I've seen several videos of yours lately, so not sure in which one it appeared. Remote viewing is compatible with my version of quantum mind theory. As I've stated earlier, I believe the definition of human consciousness is: "an above-threshold spatio-temporal pattern of biophotonic energy that matches a template that already exists in the universe." During neural development, from conception to early adulthood, each idea (simple at first) provides the structure for more complex, more abstract ideas to assemble and change the neuro-architecture. This is bottom-up processing or development.
But there are also top-down influences that start shaping the brain's organization. No living neuroscientist knows where the hell those top-down concepts come from. The assumption is that the human mind creates higher abstract concepts, and miraculously billions of humans construct them similarly (yeah, right). Each idea feels like our own. The human skull does not permit photons to enter, so there is pretty much a black background upon which these "quantectomes" (my word) illuminate and we feel it. No need to go back to neural activity--this is the light of the mind. These spatio-temporal patterns of pure energy might be likened to the lines connecting the stars in the Milky Way, the Big Dipper, and Little Dipper. That's how I see them. (I want to add here that I am very embarrassed to have original thoughts and ideas, but I've had them since I was a little girl. My family makes fun of me. My son calls me a whack job, even though he loves me. Interestingly, my late husband was that kind of scientist who is respected because he always thought along with the mainstream--slightly creative, but not too much. I was told I ruined my late husband's credibility with my crazy ideas. But 30 years later, my theory of Alzheimer's disease still hangs together better than any other. And the FDA is approving drugs that they know don't work. I digress.)
(3) Back to free-thinking in the framework of my quantum mind theory. I see the human mind not as series of connectomes (maps of neurons firing together during a certain task as measured by functional imaging), but as a quantectome--series of electrons in tubulin pockets entangling triggered by biophotons activated by neural activity generating metabolic activity. Unlike the connectome, the quantectome is free to interact with "idea templates," consisting of floating spatio-temporal patterns of energies than CAN permeate the skull. Thoughts in our head are private because visible light energy is kept out. But the templates responsible for these ideas can pass through the skull because they are of different frequency. This concept works well for explaining language acquisition. Chomsky pretty much had the idea of universal language templates. But from where does original thought arise? Is it our mind that conceives it, or our mind that perceives it? Big difference, with major implications for patent protections. You can't patent ideas that nature created.
(4) Conclusion: Everyone is a psychic and everyone is a creative genius, but most people inhibit those functions in fear of social reprisals. These abilities are nonetheless observable in certain situations. Consider, for example, "trends." What makes everyone love the latest movie star or singer, or buy the latest fashions? These subtle cues circulate like wildfire.
Well, you know how Clif thinks about woman. He's said some things recently that leads me to believe he thinks of females like the ones he says jigged us at the start.
The fact I don't have a foreskin does not preclude me from flying one of those machines. I have a type of 'thrust' he'd envy, if I let him measure it. 😄
Oh this is an interesting and a somewhat endlessly dispiriting message about women.
Man loves woman... man is deeply attracted to woman... man feels woman has power over him and then vilifies woman (with lots of twists and complexities coming from man and woman)... man works to disempower woman. (This is a gross generalization, I certainly hope.)
The history of this is very dense. The relation of man to woman, owner and property very distinctly in some periods of history.
And in our present moment there is such a twist/perversion of our sexuality culturally, that has been going on for a long time as well.
It's so amped up right now. I believe to really destroy our power (not in power over another). Our 'energetic' power. How energy moves through us, flows.
'We' are well trained to disempower each other without much thought/consciousness around our sexuality.
I am just glossing over this unfortunately. (And I should add that I don't think shaming is the way)
I have a different perspective on this. First man's sex is very public in a way. Think of a young boy who is starting to feel sexual excitement. It is very public and can then be coupled with shame early on. Now I am not a man so I don't know what it is like to grow and develop sexually as a man.
•
I also feel that sex is vilified as something bad, from many fronts. Which might take us back to how the early experience of sexual arousal is experienced.
But if men, in a very generalized way are repressing their sexuality and then are aroused by women, there's going to be an internal battle there.
I would not describe sexuality as a weakness though.
I think our culture perverts it and it gets confused.
Quite possibly as a horrible purposeful agenda that is coming quite clear right now.
•
My feeling is many men are craving/needing to be met intimately. Not just sexually though. And it gets confused.
Yes, I agree. There are a lot of pieces here. I can't attest for the way men feel and right now we are getting mostly the LBGTQ+ version. Heteros aren't discussing any of this. Natural arousal is a necessary reaction to progression as a species. But, sexualization is another animal. Women are being degraded. You can see it in the trans selfish way of 'acting as a woman' desired. Uncontrolled desire is the agenda not Love. **ck 'em and leave was not the intended route to 'go forth and multiply' and honor your parents.
Women have more to offer than just a body. Women nourish & share, men hunt & destroy. Men live selfishly not having to sacrifice body & soul for another life. Men can have children and not be changed by it. Not so much for women.
I think we are being pushed to fear, to be divided. To be angry and feel rage.
Our boundaries are being violated in horrifying ways.
Be angry, let whatever needs to come through come through. It's hard, it sucks. But don't vilify men in a generalized way. It is what is asked of you by the Powers That Shouldn't Be. It's a trap.
Don't vilify sex. Being sexualized is something quite different than sex.
I am not angry. I am not vilifying all men. I've got nothing against sex. I am saying the human experience is being usurped by the inhumane. That these displays of what a woman is by men dressed up as women is a selfish act/drama that stems from fear of love. There is no love, caring, sharing in desire. Wanting is suffering, you are suffering from need not from what is love.
I think this whole overblown trans piece is being pushed in 'our' faces by design. And no, men who feel they want to be or are woman and display that by wearing dresses and makeup has nothing to do with being a woman. And whether you are angry or not is for you to know not me. There's nothing wrong with being angry though.
Clif just forgets how powerful women are. We get sidetracked creating miracles with how cute babies are. I'm as old as Clif. I came to earth (this time) to do battle. I'm on his team, he just doesn't know it.
Hello. I'm glad to hear why you came here this time. I'm here for the same reason and I'm older than you. I'm 74 and been preparing for this battle my whole life. Literally!
I'm on Clif's team too. The information he has shared with us cleared up and finalized a mission I've been on my whole life.
I sought to know the name of God. I started actively researching the 'One Who's Idea I Am' back in '72. I've studied every religion known to man and even lost my husband in '86 on the blood altar of one of them.
Its been a hard slog. I've done it alone till now. I know what Clif is purporting is true. I'm willing to go to the wall for it!
I will not suffer his disparagement of my being a woman as strong and/or intelligent as he though.
He has mentioned that occasionally he has found in the literature information stating that some women can drive a mind-to-machine device that men without foreskins can not. (Their vagus nerve is damaged.
The whole idea of removing the foreskin was to protect the population from enslavement by the alien masters.)
I get it!
What I don't get is the arrogance Clif displays towards the people he's leading into this new paradigm. He needs to chill out his disdain for some of his lowly troops, eh?
Time is too short, and the mission too important, to tiptoe around easily offended people. We're at war. Blunt gets to the point quickly and without confusion. We must say it as we see it.
I'm gonna have to get out the dictionary! Have you given thought to the concept that thought/mind/awareness of self does not exist in the brain, but in the aura's electrical field surrounding the body? Clif recently did a podcast that focused, in part, on reincarnation inasmuch as "I" am always "I" with the influence of culture/nurture and the "veil of forgetfulness," all of which exists outside the human body. (And you sound perfectly rational and an "independent" rather than "free" thinker. Nice to meet you!)
I am very familiar with Eileen and this modality and have actually taken level 1 of her course. Yes, we hold memory in our energetic field. Thanks for sharing.
Elizabeth, I encourage you to have a live bio-field tuning session if you have not already done so. This modality was key in my ability to start addressing to childhood trauma and the resulting physical manifestations that accompany that. Since then, I have been on a tangent of sorts, investigating as many avenues as possible regarding sound and light.
Yeah I'm interested in it, the conversation of it. But I'm doing my own work, that involves me playing and exploring. Through voice work, vibration. And many other pieces.
It's often felt derailed by the 'shit show', but that's me needing to choose where I put my attention.
Elena, I encourage you to research solutions outside the conventional "box". You may find the work of Dr. Gabor Mate interesting regarding trauma and physical manifestations. There are a number of modalities that may be beneficial--Bio-field tuning, the Energy Enhancement System, Acupuncture, gentle yoga, and a exploration into possible trauma. Physical manifestations are communications. Mind and body are one, they cannot be diced and sliced. Lending energy in your exploration.
I had an issue after surgery also. Fixed up my vertebrae and pinched nerves but soon after developed pain. Scar tissue buildup around the nerves seemed to be the culprit and apparently olive skinned folks scar well. Or worse, depending on perspective. That reasoning for my pain issue seemed rational enough, and the fact that as far as doing well at scarring, I've got a whole herd of real doosies so I was easy enough to convince that it might just be the case. Of course none of that makes any difference when the Doc says he's got good news and bad news and the Good News is that it's never going to get any better. lol
He doesn't have the skills, the tools, the understanding to help you.
Any kind of boundary violation is going to disrupt the flow of energy through your body and create blockages. Being physically or sexually abused, likely more so as a child, can have devastating effects in ways that I think most don't understand.
Had to go back and reread the posts to be sure I got the context right. I used to call/think of myself as a "free thinker" which was considered indicative of "radical" viewpoints (and some of my views were/are), but labels affect how one's views are received (as you have indicated, by your closest and dearest thinking you're "out there"). The term "free thinker" no longer has the same connotation as it did 30-40 years ago. Somewhat disreputable. Undisciplined. Unreliable. The word "independent" puts the concept of "independence" as part of one's innate character out there (purposefully or not), that one is not bound by the conventional views or rationale. You may still think of yourself as a "free thinker" (I know I do, but that's just an old habit), but the other-than-me perception of yourself is stronger, more definitive. It relies on your own concept of "independent" in relation to more than just "thought." It's all semantics, but that embodies how people relate to each other subconsciously. I am trying to be precise. Sorry if it sounds pedantic.
I'm afraid my independence and being "different" is a life-long affliction, and it sounds as if you have been similarly challenged. People have told me I'm weird all my life, although no one has ever explained what they mean. (Likely they don't know.) One person said because I express opinions no one else will say, that I'll speak up. I've learned two things: 1) Dropping "seeds" (of information, views, positions) is my job. 2) Stuff can't be unheard. Sometimes just stating something they don't expect to hear will set people to thinking - eventually. At least, we're all hoping the normies have that capacity.
Nevada, could you expand on your thoughts concerning the Alzhemeirs issue you referenced. I am sure many of us would like to know more about this subject and your thoughts and research on it. Please elaborate. Thanks.
I believe Alzheimer's disease (AD) is breakdown in neuroplasticity. This breakdown occurs when key proteins, which are needed for the brain cell to remodel properly, are no longer produced in vulnerable cells. Advanced age is the number one risk factor for AD. As we age, certain proteins are no longer expressed in sufficient quantities. Some of these proteins underlie neuroplasticity.
How I got interested in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is my late husband and I mapped the pathways in the brain for acetylcholine. We completed that work in the early 1980's, and our map was published in most of the textbooks. Around that time it was discovered that acetylcholine-producing neurons in the base of the forebrain degenerate in AD. That served as the basis for 4 of the FDA approved drugs for AD that are still prescribed today. But these acetylcholine-enhancing (cholinergic) drugs don't work well. Perhaps there is a short window of relief, but no lasting cure.
Not until this year have new drugs received FDA approval. Since I first started investigating Alzheimer's disease (my husband had a psychiatrist postdoctoral fellow in the lab and we mapped acetylcholine neurons in the brainstem of AD postmortem tissue we obtained from the VA hospital coroner in LA), the hypotheses were: (1) a cholinergic deficit, (2) an amyloid problem, or (3) a tau tangle problem. I was eager to find a link between the acetylcholine neurons and the cells in the cerebral cortex that were afflicted with plaques and tangles. I noticed that microtubules and neurofilaments were key proteins in both plaque and tangle formation. What was the link? What made the microtubule protein tau curl up into indigestible tangles? Why did amyloid deposits accumulate? Those were the questions driving my further research.
Antibodies to microtubules, tau, and neurofilaments were commercially available, so I started playing around with them. I didn't see much in the human brain tissue, but I started training lab rats on a learning paradigm and then looked at the microtubules and a stabilizing protein called MAP-2. I was lucky and got an immediate result: Microtubules and their binding proteins (MAP, tau) break down and then rearrange the architecture of select neurons with learning. That's when a friend of mine contacted me to tell me about Roger Penrose's work with Stuart Hameroff. Shortly thereafter, Hameroff invited me to Tucson whereupon we started a collaboration.
Penrose and Hameroff think consciousness is created in small pockets of microtubules. Hameroff has worked on this idea over 30 years and he's recruited scientists across the globe to help. They liked my evidence that microtubules appear to store long-term memory. So what happens in Alzheimer's disease according to the theory my late husband and I wrote up in 1989 and 1990 is that neuroplasticity creates something like a repetitive-use injury in vulnerable neurons. Only highly plastic neurons in the medial temporal and prefrontal lobes are affected. Only large pyramidal neurons are affected. This repetitive-injury situation could drive the down regulation of the expression of key proteins related to microtubules that is seen in AD brain.
My view is microtubules are affected first in the AD progression, with tau and amyloid accumulation occurring second and being triggered by the microtubule degeneration. There is excellent support for this idea taking into account many different findings. The microtubule defects could be addressed by adding mRNA for specific tubulins. The human brain cells in question make around a dozen different subtypes of tubulins. Some of those most needed for neuroplasticity stop being expressed in AD brain, again, most likely because of repetitive use.
I presented this idea multiple times, even to the KM. But the KM has no use for it. The 3 new FDA-approved AD drugs attack amyloid. Even though early clinical trials show these drugs do not work well and can cause brain bleeds, the FDA approved. Makes sense to me why the anti-amyloid drugs cause brain bleeds. Amyloid deposits can be likened to a scab forming on a damaged neuron. That neuron isn't working because its insides are being twisted by faulty microtubules and tau accumulation. Tearing off a scab is not going to help the neuron function any better and might well be expected to cause brain bleeds.
But common sense has no place in Big Pharma. Part of getting FDA approval for these new anti-amyloid drugs is that there is NO ALTERNATIVE. We live in a sick society and I agree with Clif that the KM is largely to blame.
Interesting data. Your conclusions about pharma are true across everything they do. Who cares if it works; if we can sell it as working, we'll make $$. I'll take an old-fashioned herbalist any day!
Nevada, there have been some interesting advances recently driven by many pioneers in the field like yourself. Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Dale Bredesen and his team? They have discovered that lifestyle and diet changes along with improved sleep and the removal of toxins have been extremely helpful in slowing the progress of the disease and in some cases actually improving the cognition and memory of subjects in their scope of the study. They are currently involved with clinical trials in 5 different cities in the US and after reviewing some of their findings and the progress they have made, I must say what I have reviewed is impressive.
check it out, would be interested in your thoughts after reviewing some of their work and progress.
I know Dale Bredesen from when he was an Assistant Professor at UCLA Neurology. He and my late husband discovered a death receptor that might explain Alzheimer's disease progression. I remember Dale calling my husband at 3AM sometimes. Dale spent many years as Director at the Buck Institute and became less optimistic about curing AD with pharmacology. I often recommend his book to people asking for realistic help. I still wonder why Dale went holistic with his particularly strong background in molecular biology.
Induction of apoptosis by the low-affinity NGF receptor. S Rabizadeh, J Oh, L Zhong, J Yang, CM Bitler, LL Butcher, DE Bredesen. Science 261 (5119), 345-348, 1993.
"Very embarrassed to have original thoughts and ideas"... a shame you feel embarrassment. Originality is an accomplishment in a time where conformity and obedience has been highly promoted. If more had survived the agenda to erode critical thinking skills, we wouldn't be ensnared as deeply. Hope you are embracing what is indeed the truth.... advanced mental capabilities as your conclusion states, are a fact & should never be squelched in deference to what others think. Also, popular trends of what high profile detractors posit have never appealed to many of us. We recognize what they represent. Pseudoscience was coined, as was conspiracy theorists and vast other terms to shame those who could "see" through their orchestrations. We can simply refuse their labels without a second thought. Embrace your abilities despite what others say. You've known the truth since you were a child, and our childhood selves recognize truth.
Thank you for what I'm sure is meant to be encouragement. But the fault is not in me; I'm neither timid nor defeated. I can't stop seeing the truth, even if I might like to stop. Certain people are "chosen" to be respected by the group. If you challenge the chosen leaders' version of the truth, you are ignored, punished, or worst case scenario, condemned. End of story.
You are right about obedience impeding creativity. I think China has a problem with its highly obedient people being less inventive. That's why China steals our intellectual property, or so it's been said. But if ideas are templates floating in the universe, do they really belong to anyone? That's the problem with the KM; they want to own ideas and exclusively profit from those ideas. When they are in control, no one is safe or happy. The KM feels exactly the opposite: They feel unsafe when we have any power, any money, or even a bit of food or fuel.
series of electrons in tubulin pockets entangling triggered by biophotons activated by neural activity generating metabolic activity. R U suggesting this is only in the brain or in the aether?
Thoughts in our head are private because visible light energy is kept out. Trends tell u that our thots are not private but connected or even suggested.
The idea is that high-awareness thought and the stream of conscious is private (because that's based on biophotons in one living brain), whereas the vague templates upon which thoughts are universal are made of other energies that can penetrate the skull.
Subtle cues from others (when the eyes meet, when we get the story, the idea or joke at exactly the same time as someone else) might be transmitted by other energies, as might universal thought templates (rules of grammar and syntax, mathematics, and the laws of physics and medicine).
Remote viewing could be mediated by other energies that travel across time. I do think human memory is a quantum entanglement of high-awareness conscious moments across time. Anticipation might be similar--a link to a future conscious moment. But it's just a moment-to-moment link, not future telling, according to this model.
What is your opinion on times when you think of another person, speak of same person, ponder them.....then, they call or show up in your life? In connection, also the so called repetitiveness of life moments as named Deja Vu' ? Are we the universe or are we in the universe as a universe?
Great question! I think there are multiple possibilities and I will list them from what I consider least likely to most likely:
(1) It's a coincidence. Yes, certainly sometimes that's true but not always, and maybe not that often.
(2) Some event occurred in the news, either local or globally, that made the two of you think of each other at the same time. Sometimes this is true.
(3) You and this person have experienced quantum entanglement in the past. You loved, laughed or learned together. Now that entanglement cycles and recharges periodically and you think of one another in a brief instantaneous moment. This leads to one or both of you reaching out.
(4) All the above, and you can usually guess which scenario.
I understand what you're saying as well. Although the language of it is unfamiliar but it taps into my intuitive experience.
I'm noticing some push back to Cliff's work from some who say they believe in God and quote the bible. It feels like fear of the human, a vilification of.
-----------------------
To the question of consuming gold. I recently listened to an Alfa Vedic conversation (I'm not super familiar with their work), where they speak of using gold in their products. But I believe (and I am vague in this) as how it occurs in soil before it becomes 'metal'.
There seems quite a bit of talk about the 'occult' and how it is pushing the 'agenda' itself. Which is one piece. But now it is being used as, what seems to me, a very limited fearful way of viewing each other. Of humans themselves
Okay here goes it:
(1) I've always seen parapsychology, remote viewing, and ESP as pseudoscience. But then I got involved in collaborations with Hameroff and his friends, and they all believe it. They also hook up with other scientists who receive grant money from the DOD for research on remote viewing, so maybe they're simply in it for the money. As I've mentioned before, I think Hameroff is a free-thinker and NOT in it for the money. Me? I'm slightly more mainstream than Hameroff, but I also consider myself a free-thinker.
(2) This idea of free thinkers astonishes me. Something you said, Clif, struck me. I've seen several videos of yours lately, so not sure in which one it appeared. Remote viewing is compatible with my version of quantum mind theory. As I've stated earlier, I believe the definition of human consciousness is: "an above-threshold spatio-temporal pattern of biophotonic energy that matches a template that already exists in the universe." During neural development, from conception to early adulthood, each idea (simple at first) provides the structure for more complex, more abstract ideas to assemble and change the neuro-architecture. This is bottom-up processing or development.
But there are also top-down influences that start shaping the brain's organization. No living neuroscientist knows where the hell those top-down concepts come from. The assumption is that the human mind creates higher abstract concepts, and miraculously billions of humans construct them similarly (yeah, right). Each idea feels like our own. The human skull does not permit photons to enter, so there is pretty much a black background upon which these "quantectomes" (my word) illuminate and we feel it. No need to go back to neural activity--this is the light of the mind. These spatio-temporal patterns of pure energy might be likened to the lines connecting the stars in the Milky Way, the Big Dipper, and Little Dipper. That's how I see them. (I want to add here that I am very embarrassed to have original thoughts and ideas, but I've had them since I was a little girl. My family makes fun of me. My son calls me a whack job, even though he loves me. Interestingly, my late husband was that kind of scientist who is respected because he always thought along with the mainstream--slightly creative, but not too much. I was told I ruined my late husband's credibility with my crazy ideas. But 30 years later, my theory of Alzheimer's disease still hangs together better than any other. And the FDA is approving drugs that they know don't work. I digress.)
(3) Back to free-thinking in the framework of my quantum mind theory. I see the human mind not as series of connectomes (maps of neurons firing together during a certain task as measured by functional imaging), but as a quantectome--series of electrons in tubulin pockets entangling triggered by biophotons activated by neural activity generating metabolic activity. Unlike the connectome, the quantectome is free to interact with "idea templates," consisting of floating spatio-temporal patterns of energies than CAN permeate the skull. Thoughts in our head are private because visible light energy is kept out. But the templates responsible for these ideas can pass through the skull because they are of different frequency. This concept works well for explaining language acquisition. Chomsky pretty much had the idea of universal language templates. But from where does original thought arise? Is it our mind that conceives it, or our mind that perceives it? Big difference, with major implications for patent protections. You can't patent ideas that nature created.
(4) Conclusion: Everyone is a psychic and everyone is a creative genius, but most people inhibit those functions in fear of social reprisals. These abilities are nonetheless observable in certain situations. Consider, for example, "trends." What makes everyone love the latest movie star or singer, or buy the latest fashions? These subtle cues circulate like wildfire.
I'm following you. I'm female too. I even understand what you're saying.
LOL! As a straight line that's a 9.5 :)
Well, you know how Clif thinks about woman. He's said some things recently that leads me to believe he thinks of females like the ones he says jigged us at the start.
The fact I don't have a foreskin does not preclude me from flying one of those machines. I have a type of 'thrust' he'd envy, if I let him measure it. 😄
Oh this is an interesting and a somewhat endlessly dispiriting message about women.
Man loves woman... man is deeply attracted to woman... man feels woman has power over him and then vilifies woman (with lots of twists and complexities coming from man and woman)... man works to disempower woman. (This is a gross generalization, I certainly hope.)
That's just exactly what it is. "man feels woman has power over him...."
I think it's silly. We all have power. Too bad we can't work together against the common enemy.
The history of this is very dense. The relation of man to woman, owner and property very distinctly in some periods of history.
And in our present moment there is such a twist/perversion of our sexuality culturally, that has been going on for a long time as well.
It's so amped up right now. I believe to really destroy our power (not in power over another). Our 'energetic' power. How energy moves through us, flows.
'We' are well trained to disempower each other without much thought/consciousness around our sexuality.
I am just glossing over this unfortunately. (And I should add that I don't think shaming is the way)
Wouldn't that be lovely!
Bingo! Playing the division game while the useless rulers AKA useless eaters AKA grasshoppers) rub their hands in delight.
Men cannot control his weakness/attraction to woman so they oppress and control the woman instead of their urge. Blame misplaced. Hate induced.
I have a different perspective on this. First man's sex is very public in a way. Think of a young boy who is starting to feel sexual excitement. It is very public and can then be coupled with shame early on. Now I am not a man so I don't know what it is like to grow and develop sexually as a man.
•
I also feel that sex is vilified as something bad, from many fronts. Which might take us back to how the early experience of sexual arousal is experienced.
But if men, in a very generalized way are repressing their sexuality and then are aroused by women, there's going to be an internal battle there.
I would not describe sexuality as a weakness though.
I think our culture perverts it and it gets confused.
Quite possibly as a horrible purposeful agenda that is coming quite clear right now.
•
My feeling is many men are craving/needing to be met intimately. Not just sexually though. And it gets confused.
•
There are a lot of pieces here.
Yes, I agree. There are a lot of pieces here. I can't attest for the way men feel and right now we are getting mostly the LBGTQ+ version. Heteros aren't discussing any of this. Natural arousal is a necessary reaction to progression as a species. But, sexualization is another animal. Women are being degraded. You can see it in the trans selfish way of 'acting as a woman' desired. Uncontrolled desire is the agenda not Love. **ck 'em and leave was not the intended route to 'go forth and multiply' and honor your parents.
Women have more to offer than just a body. Women nourish & share, men hunt & destroy. Men live selfishly not having to sacrifice body & soul for another life. Men can have children and not be changed by it. Not so much for women.
I don’t think it’s possible to remain unaffected by having children--it’s not in the genetic code. A part of a social code, perhaps.
I've seen many men ignore their offspring until later in life when they are looking for that legacy thang :)) Invisible until useful.
There’s a fine line when it comes to that “legacy” construct and the actual communication involving DNA. Your point is taken, however v.
I understand your feelings.
I understand your words.
I don't disagree.
I think we are being pushed to fear, to be divided. To be angry and feel rage.
Our boundaries are being violated in horrifying ways.
Be angry, let whatever needs to come through come through. It's hard, it sucks. But don't vilify men in a generalized way. It is what is asked of you by the Powers That Shouldn't Be. It's a trap.
Don't vilify sex. Being sexualized is something quite different than sex.
I am not angry. I am not vilifying all men. I've got nothing against sex. I am saying the human experience is being usurped by the inhumane. That these displays of what a woman is by men dressed up as women is a selfish act/drama that stems from fear of love. There is no love, caring, sharing in desire. Wanting is suffering, you are suffering from need not from what is love.
I don't quite follow you.
I think this whole overblown trans piece is being pushed in 'our' faces by design. And no, men who feel they want to be or are woman and display that by wearing dresses and makeup has nothing to do with being a woman. And whether you are angry or not is for you to know not me. There's nothing wrong with being angry though.
Sorry if I offended you in some way.
Maybe I should have just said, of course men can control themselves. That some don't, doesn't mean it's not possible.
You can be attracted to someone without acting on it.
And now I am hearing Jeff Goldblum's voice in my head....
YUP!!!! And next,.....the Butterfly Effect! I love it when we have the same thoughts at the same time! :)
❤️
Clif just forgets how powerful women are. We get sidetracked creating miracles with how cute babies are. I'm as old as Clif. I came to earth (this time) to do battle. I'm on his team, he just doesn't know it.
"Masculinity creates and maintains Civilization, while Femininity creates and maintains Life" - Clif High
Hello. I'm glad to hear why you came here this time. I'm here for the same reason and I'm older than you. I'm 74 and been preparing for this battle my whole life. Literally!
I'm on Clif's team too. The information he has shared with us cleared up and finalized a mission I've been on my whole life.
I sought to know the name of God. I started actively researching the 'One Who's Idea I Am' back in '72. I've studied every religion known to man and even lost my husband in '86 on the blood altar of one of them.
Its been a hard slog. I've done it alone till now. I know what Clif is purporting is true. I'm willing to go to the wall for it!
I will not suffer his disparagement of my being a woman as strong and/or intelligent as he though.
He has mentioned that occasionally he has found in the literature information stating that some women can drive a mind-to-machine device that men without foreskins can not. (Their vagus nerve is damaged.
The whole idea of removing the foreskin was to protect the population from enslavement by the alien masters.)
I get it!
What I don't get is the arrogance Clif displays towards the people he's leading into this new paradigm. He needs to chill out his disdain for some of his lowly troops, eh?
Time is too short, and the mission too important, to tiptoe around easily offended people. We're at war. Blunt gets to the point quickly and without confusion. We must say it as we see it.
Well, I don't have one either, I don't think it's affecting my thrust but I'll let you try it first.
Who am I kidding, I would try it. Curiosity killed the cat.
😄
Sounds like a proposition to me.
Yeah, very subtle!!!
Only for a moment. We have 9 lives you know - that's plenty for a test drive :) LOL
I'm gonna have to get out the dictionary! Have you given thought to the concept that thought/mind/awareness of self does not exist in the brain, but in the aura's electrical field surrounding the body? Clif recently did a podcast that focused, in part, on reincarnation inasmuch as "I" am always "I" with the influence of culture/nurture and the "veil of forgetfulness," all of which exists outside the human body. (And you sound perfectly rational and an "independent" rather than "free" thinker. Nice to meet you!)
I agree and this auric field holds all memory from all existences.
I wonder if this conversation is of interest and relates to what you speak to:
https://youtu.be/a76FpWpHYXU?si=UqTBMOTbu4fF2YLF
I am very familiar with Eileen and this modality and have actually taken level 1 of her course. Yes, we hold memory in our energetic field. Thanks for sharing.
It's new to me and very interesting.
That's wonderful you are studying it.
Elizabeth, I encourage you to have a live bio-field tuning session if you have not already done so. This modality was key in my ability to start addressing to childhood trauma and the resulting physical manifestations that accompany that. Since then, I have been on a tangent of sorts, investigating as many avenues as possible regarding sound and light.
Yeah I'm interested in it, the conversation of it. But I'm doing my own work, that involves me playing and exploring. Through voice work, vibration. And many other pieces.
It's often felt derailed by the 'shit show', but that's me needing to choose where I put my attention.
Lending energy in your exploration. Sound and vibration are the future of healing, IMO.
I feel the same.
I think we can also heal each other with our voices when we resonate well. It can be quite beautiful.
I had an experience of just sitting in the presence of another and having a very interesting experience. (Through a video call!!!)
The link is to a piece I wrote about it. (Don't feel obliged to read)
https://thedancingmerganser.substack.com/p/presence
Beautiful and a beneficial release of energy.
And thank you ❤️
Elena, I encourage you to research solutions outside the conventional "box". You may find the work of Dr. Gabor Mate interesting regarding trauma and physical manifestations. There are a number of modalities that may be beneficial--Bio-field tuning, the Energy Enhancement System, Acupuncture, gentle yoga, and a exploration into possible trauma. Physical manifestations are communications. Mind and body are one, they cannot be diced and sliced. Lending energy in your exploration.
Excellent!
I had an issue after surgery also. Fixed up my vertebrae and pinched nerves but soon after developed pain. Scar tissue buildup around the nerves seemed to be the culprit and apparently olive skinned folks scar well. Or worse, depending on perspective. That reasoning for my pain issue seemed rational enough, and the fact that as far as doing well at scarring, I've got a whole herd of real doosies so I was easy enough to convince that it might just be the case. Of course none of that makes any difference when the Doc says he's got good news and bad news and the Good News is that it's never going to get any better. lol
Check Spooky2 RIFE also, many had good results for what I term "mechanical problems", check testimonials.
He doesn't have the skills, the tools, the understanding to help you.
Any kind of boundary violation is going to disrupt the flow of energy through your body and create blockages. Being physically or sexually abused, likely more so as a child, can have devastating effects in ways that I think most don't understand.
Yeah watch the video it's fascinating.
What, in your thinking, is the difference between independent and free, as they relate to thought.
Had to go back and reread the posts to be sure I got the context right. I used to call/think of myself as a "free thinker" which was considered indicative of "radical" viewpoints (and some of my views were/are), but labels affect how one's views are received (as you have indicated, by your closest and dearest thinking you're "out there"). The term "free thinker" no longer has the same connotation as it did 30-40 years ago. Somewhat disreputable. Undisciplined. Unreliable. The word "independent" puts the concept of "independence" as part of one's innate character out there (purposefully or not), that one is not bound by the conventional views or rationale. You may still think of yourself as a "free thinker" (I know I do, but that's just an old habit), but the other-than-me perception of yourself is stronger, more definitive. It relies on your own concept of "independent" in relation to more than just "thought." It's all semantics, but that embodies how people relate to each other subconsciously. I am trying to be precise. Sorry if it sounds pedantic.
No it doesn't sound pedantic. I think the distinction is very important.
Although people will often misunderstand each other no matter what words are used.
Thank you for explaining this to me!
I'm afraid my independence and being "different" is a life-long affliction, and it sounds as if you have been similarly challenged. People have told me I'm weird all my life, although no one has ever explained what they mean. (Likely they don't know.) One person said because I express opinions no one else will say, that I'll speak up. I've learned two things: 1) Dropping "seeds" (of information, views, positions) is my job. 2) Stuff can't be unheard. Sometimes just stating something they don't expect to hear will set people to thinking - eventually. At least, we're all hoping the normies have that capacity.
Nevada, could you expand on your thoughts concerning the Alzhemeirs issue you referenced. I am sure many of us would like to know more about this subject and your thoughts and research on it. Please elaborate. Thanks.
I believe Alzheimer's disease (AD) is breakdown in neuroplasticity. This breakdown occurs when key proteins, which are needed for the brain cell to remodel properly, are no longer produced in vulnerable cells. Advanced age is the number one risk factor for AD. As we age, certain proteins are no longer expressed in sufficient quantities. Some of these proteins underlie neuroplasticity.
How I got interested in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is my late husband and I mapped the pathways in the brain for acetylcholine. We completed that work in the early 1980's, and our map was published in most of the textbooks. Around that time it was discovered that acetylcholine-producing neurons in the base of the forebrain degenerate in AD. That served as the basis for 4 of the FDA approved drugs for AD that are still prescribed today. But these acetylcholine-enhancing (cholinergic) drugs don't work well. Perhaps there is a short window of relief, but no lasting cure.
Not until this year have new drugs received FDA approval. Since I first started investigating Alzheimer's disease (my husband had a psychiatrist postdoctoral fellow in the lab and we mapped acetylcholine neurons in the brainstem of AD postmortem tissue we obtained from the VA hospital coroner in LA), the hypotheses were: (1) a cholinergic deficit, (2) an amyloid problem, or (3) a tau tangle problem. I was eager to find a link between the acetylcholine neurons and the cells in the cerebral cortex that were afflicted with plaques and tangles. I noticed that microtubules and neurofilaments were key proteins in both plaque and tangle formation. What was the link? What made the microtubule protein tau curl up into indigestible tangles? Why did amyloid deposits accumulate? Those were the questions driving my further research.
Antibodies to microtubules, tau, and neurofilaments were commercially available, so I started playing around with them. I didn't see much in the human brain tissue, but I started training lab rats on a learning paradigm and then looked at the microtubules and a stabilizing protein called MAP-2. I was lucky and got an immediate result: Microtubules and their binding proteins (MAP, tau) break down and then rearrange the architecture of select neurons with learning. That's when a friend of mine contacted me to tell me about Roger Penrose's work with Stuart Hameroff. Shortly thereafter, Hameroff invited me to Tucson whereupon we started a collaboration.
Penrose and Hameroff think consciousness is created in small pockets of microtubules. Hameroff has worked on this idea over 30 years and he's recruited scientists across the globe to help. They liked my evidence that microtubules appear to store long-term memory. So what happens in Alzheimer's disease according to the theory my late husband and I wrote up in 1989 and 1990 is that neuroplasticity creates something like a repetitive-use injury in vulnerable neurons. Only highly plastic neurons in the medial temporal and prefrontal lobes are affected. Only large pyramidal neurons are affected. This repetitive-injury situation could drive the down regulation of the expression of key proteins related to microtubules that is seen in AD brain.
My view is microtubules are affected first in the AD progression, with tau and amyloid accumulation occurring second and being triggered by the microtubule degeneration. There is excellent support for this idea taking into account many different findings. The microtubule defects could be addressed by adding mRNA for specific tubulins. The human brain cells in question make around a dozen different subtypes of tubulins. Some of those most needed for neuroplasticity stop being expressed in AD brain, again, most likely because of repetitive use.
I presented this idea multiple times, even to the KM. But the KM has no use for it. The 3 new FDA-approved AD drugs attack amyloid. Even though early clinical trials show these drugs do not work well and can cause brain bleeds, the FDA approved. Makes sense to me why the anti-amyloid drugs cause brain bleeds. Amyloid deposits can be likened to a scab forming on a damaged neuron. That neuron isn't working because its insides are being twisted by faulty microtubules and tau accumulation. Tearing off a scab is not going to help the neuron function any better and might well be expected to cause brain bleeds.
But common sense has no place in Big Pharma. Part of getting FDA approval for these new anti-amyloid drugs is that there is NO ALTERNATIVE. We live in a sick society and I agree with Clif that the KM is largely to blame.
Interesting data. Your conclusions about pharma are true across everything they do. Who cares if it works; if we can sell it as working, we'll make $$. I'll take an old-fashioned herbalist any day!
Nevada, there have been some interesting advances recently driven by many pioneers in the field like yourself. Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Dale Bredesen and his team? They have discovered that lifestyle and diet changes along with improved sleep and the removal of toxins have been extremely helpful in slowing the progress of the disease and in some cases actually improving the cognition and memory of subjects in their scope of the study. They are currently involved with clinical trials in 5 different cities in the US and after reviewing some of their findings and the progress they have made, I must say what I have reviewed is impressive.
check it out, would be interested in your thoughts after reviewing some of their work and progress.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGHcKEFvl5I
I know Dale Bredesen from when he was an Assistant Professor at UCLA Neurology. He and my late husband discovered a death receptor that might explain Alzheimer's disease progression. I remember Dale calling my husband at 3AM sometimes. Dale spent many years as Director at the Buck Institute and became less optimistic about curing AD with pharmacology. I often recommend his book to people asking for realistic help. I still wonder why Dale went holistic with his particularly strong background in molecular biology.
Induction of apoptosis by the low-affinity NGF receptor. S Rabizadeh, J Oh, L Zhong, J Yang, CM Bitler, LL Butcher, DE Bredesen. Science 261 (5119), 345-348, 1993.
If Clif were single, he'd be after you!
he's married?
Clif’s wife (Kathy) is the only woman he’s ever been with, according to what he shared many years ago.
He mentions his wife from time to time.
"Very embarrassed to have original thoughts and ideas"... a shame you feel embarrassment. Originality is an accomplishment in a time where conformity and obedience has been highly promoted. If more had survived the agenda to erode critical thinking skills, we wouldn't be ensnared as deeply. Hope you are embracing what is indeed the truth.... advanced mental capabilities as your conclusion states, are a fact & should never be squelched in deference to what others think. Also, popular trends of what high profile detractors posit have never appealed to many of us. We recognize what they represent. Pseudoscience was coined, as was conspiracy theorists and vast other terms to shame those who could "see" through their orchestrations. We can simply refuse their labels without a second thought. Embrace your abilities despite what others say. You've known the truth since you were a child, and our childhood selves recognize truth.
Thank you for what I'm sure is meant to be encouragement. But the fault is not in me; I'm neither timid nor defeated. I can't stop seeing the truth, even if I might like to stop. Certain people are "chosen" to be respected by the group. If you challenge the chosen leaders' version of the truth, you are ignored, punished, or worst case scenario, condemned. End of story.
You are right about obedience impeding creativity. I think China has a problem with its highly obedient people being less inventive. That's why China steals our intellectual property, or so it's been said. But if ideas are templates floating in the universe, do they really belong to anyone? That's the problem with the KM; they want to own ideas and exclusively profit from those ideas. When they are in control, no one is safe or happy. The KM feels exactly the opposite: They feel unsafe when we have any power, any money, or even a bit of food or fuel.
series of electrons in tubulin pockets entangling triggered by biophotons activated by neural activity generating metabolic activity. R U suggesting this is only in the brain or in the aether?
Thoughts in our head are private because visible light energy is kept out. Trends tell u that our thots are not private but connected or even suggested.
The idea is that high-awareness thought and the stream of conscious is private (because that's based on biophotons in one living brain), whereas the vague templates upon which thoughts are universal are made of other energies that can penetrate the skull.
Subtle cues from others (when the eyes meet, when we get the story, the idea or joke at exactly the same time as someone else) might be transmitted by other energies, as might universal thought templates (rules of grammar and syntax, mathematics, and the laws of physics and medicine).
Remote viewing could be mediated by other energies that travel across time. I do think human memory is a quantum entanglement of high-awareness conscious moments across time. Anticipation might be similar--a link to a future conscious moment. But it's just a moment-to-moment link, not future telling, according to this model.
What is your opinion on times when you think of another person, speak of same person, ponder them.....then, they call or show up in your life? In connection, also the so called repetitiveness of life moments as named Deja Vu' ? Are we the universe or are we in the universe as a universe?
Great question! I think there are multiple possibilities and I will list them from what I consider least likely to most likely:
(1) It's a coincidence. Yes, certainly sometimes that's true but not always, and maybe not that often.
(2) Some event occurred in the news, either local or globally, that made the two of you think of each other at the same time. Sometimes this is true.
(3) You and this person have experienced quantum entanglement in the past. You loved, laughed or learned together. Now that entanglement cycles and recharges periodically and you think of one another in a brief instantaneous moment. This leads to one or both of you reaching out.
(4) All the above, and you can usually guess which scenario.
Nevada, thank you for putting into words that which I have known/experienced since birth.
The cia sure believed in remote viewing btf...they spent billions and used up a lot of good lives to study it. Lucky us huh!?🤷🤦
All this wonderful knowledge and theorizing, but not enough sense to make paragraph breaks for the reader.
Thank you for the comment. I'll go back and put them in.
I understand what you're saying as well. Although the language of it is unfamiliar but it taps into my intuitive experience.
I'm noticing some push back to Cliff's work from some who say they believe in God and quote the bible. It feels like fear of the human, a vilification of.
-----------------------
To the question of consuming gold. I recently listened to an Alfa Vedic conversation (I'm not super familiar with their work), where they speak of using gold in their products. But I believe (and I am vague in this) as how it occurs in soil before it becomes 'metal'.
https://www.youtube.com/live/aNJrUOrxAjM?si=1X8pf-omGEzUUhdF
------------------------
There seems quite a bit of talk about the 'occult' and how it is pushing the 'agenda' itself. Which is one piece. But now it is being used as, what seems to me, a very limited fearful way of viewing each other. Of humans themselves
My God woman. <CR>? I mean, Reddit spacing does make things easier to read.